06 Aug Call for investment to tackle toxic algae in the Broads
Lack of investment in tackling toxic algae will have a “devastating effect” on the Broads, a national fishing organisation has warned.
Thousands of roach, bream, pike, perch and eels died in oxygen-depleted water affected by vast blooms of Prymnesium algae this year alone.
Yet the general secretary of the Pike Anglers Club of Great Britain, John Currie, says nothing has been done to combat the problem and fears the effect will be felt across the waterways.
“It’s not that the Broads Authority and the Environment Agency haven’t done enough, they have not done anything,” he said.
“Not a thing has been spent since the outbreak earlier this year and we are just being left to see what happens.
“It’s criminal in a conservation area like the Broads. We are just letting the place die through lack of investment, and it will have a devastating effect.”
The Environment Agency says it has worked with the Internal Drainage Board and Natural England to assess potential areas for fish refuges and are working with John Innes scientists. The Broads Authority says it has monitored dredging conditions.
The deadly algae affects still water and brackish systems, such as the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, but because it is not visible, the first anglers know about the bloom is once the fish are dead or in distress.
It is most common in the Upper Thurne system, at Potter Heigham, Hickling, Horsey Mere and Martham.
In April, hundreds of thousands of fish at risk of being suffocated were rescued in seine nets from Hickling and Martham Broads and moved to nearby Herbert Woods boatyard in Potter Heigham. Although the cause of the problem is not fully understood, the warm weather and salinity could be playing a part.
Mr Currie, 55, said the Environment Agency needs to invest in research and find fresh water refuges for the rescued fish.
He said the area needs to be ready or risk losing some of the one million anglers visiting the Broads every year and the £100m they contribute to the economy.
“It could happen tonight, it could really happen at any time, so it is a great worry that no money has been spent on it,” he said.
“We don’t know what is next. From the last bloom we still don’t know how many we lost, and losing more could have a huge impact on the bed and breakfasts, pubs, holiday chalets.
“The fishing numbers will drop. We need resolution and action. Everything has been a talking shop and nothing has been done.”
What has been done?
Anglers have been aware of the danger of Prymnesium since a large-scale outbreak in 1969 devastated fish stocks throughout the Thurne system.
But what do organisations say they have done to stop the problem?
The Environment Agency said: “We have carried out site visits with the Internal Drainage Board and Natural England to assess potential areas for fish refuges and how to better co-ordinate water quality monitoring. We are also working with John Innes on Prymnesium research to better understand likely triggers and factors that affect its growth.”
The Broads Authority said: “While we are not responsible for fisheries in the Broads, we have taken a variety of measures and worked closely with the Environment Agency to minimise the natural spread of Prymnesium. “These include carrying out our own testing and working with international scientists on further research, closely monitoring conditions prior to and during any dredging, minimising sediments during dredging by using silt
curtains and mud pumping and only carrying it out over winter.”
this news story was provided by Great Yarmouth Mercury